ADVERTISEMENT

Great finish to the season but

What could have been…..
I know it’s always woulda, coulda, shoulda.
So this team coulda beaten Iowa a few missed plays Shoulda beaten Ohio, the flu bug or food poisoning apparently got us. Woulda beaten Kansas, if a ref had not made such a terrible call.
Only losses to TX and OU?
Coulda been 10-2?

Regardless, it has?been a fun season, just the same.

Loyal, forever true.

FOOTBALL ***Iowa State at Kansas State game prediction winners***

Thank you to everyone who participated last week. The final score was Iowa State 42, Kansas State 35 (Iowa State by 7 and 77 total points). The Cyclones passed for 230 yards.

Here are the winners:
@CyCo had Iowa State by 6 with 48 total points and 237 passing yards for ISU - gets three months added onto the term of their subscription.
@wildcyd had Iowa State by 5 with 63 total points and 268 passing yards for ISU - gets two months added onto the term of their subscription.
@cyclone_81 had Iowa State by 5 with 61 total points and 347 passing yards for ISU - gets one month added onto the term of their subscription.

Cygarin Ratings Review of the Regular Season...

I've been trying to come up with how to show the rising trend by Campbell's team in an easy to understand way, so let me try this.

Below shows what Iowa State's rolling average "ranking" performance was over the course of the season. The first number is an average of the first three games of the season, and the last number is an average of the last three games, all others are four-game averages to better capture the up and down see-sawing that the team experienced game to game....

Iowa State's equivalent ranking performance thru the season......

72nd ranking average performance for first three games based on point spreads
70th
44th
20th
21st
18th
13th
15th
12th
3rd ranking average performance for last three games based on point spreads

As you can see Matt Campbell coached this young team from starting at playing at a level of 72nd in the country in it's first three games, to a level of 3rd in the country in it's last three games. Notice the impact that the Kansas game has on the latter average performances, the last average having dropped Kansas out.

Now let's take a look at the same above performances if I exclude four plays from two latter games: Kansas (pick six, 80 yard pass, referee error), and Texas (blocked extra point)....

72nd
70th
44th
20th
21st
18th
8th
2nd
2nd

Here, Iowa State started the season averaging 72th in the country in its first three games, and if not for four plays.... rose with a consistent and steady trend to the level of playing at an average level equal to 2nd in the country over its last four games (against three top-25 opponents, two top-10).

Here are Iowa State's individual game performances over its last four games, with the four mistakes removed....

Kansas: 7th
BYU: 5 points above No. 1 in the country
Texas: 22nd
KSU: 4 points above No. 1 in the country

What Iowa State has done at the end of the season is not a one or two game anomaly. Actually, with mistakes removed, six of Iowa State's last seven performances were at a top-15 level or better, Baylor being the lone exception. Now you can see why I considered Texas a winnable game. That expected performance did show up, but not until Kansas State. Texas was actually a drop in recent performance.


Lastly....

I noted the Cygarin Theorem last week, which suggests that for a team to have a winning record against a top-25 strength of schedule, you must be a top-25 team yourself. Like everyone else, I was prepared for a 6-6 non-winning record.

Iowa State's regular season strength of schedule finished at 7th in the country after the Kansas State game, and Iowa State finished power ranked 26th. That's close enough, but adjust for the four scoring plays, Iowa State would be solidly in the top-25.

But for Iowa State to start out at 70th in the country, and become good enough to capture a winning record against a top-7 strength of schedule is unheard of, especially considering the tougher part of the schedule was at the end of the season. That required this team to complete the season playing at a top-15 level and better to accomplish such a feat against such a strong schedule.....and they did!

In doing the Cygarin Ratings for over 30 years, I have never seen a football team go from averaging playing at a 70th rating level, to a team averaging playing at a top-10 level. And Coach Campell doing it with such a young team, and such adversity going into the season, and against a top-10 strength of schedule is nearly incomprehensible to me.

And not surprisingly, I have never seen an Iowa State team play at this high of a level of performance, against this strong of a strength of schedule, over any four-game stretch of the season. '76 was probably the only team that comes close.

What Matt Campbell has accomplished this year is something to really be cherished, and despite a 7-5 record, the best coaching up of a team over the course of a season that I have ever witnessed.

(In my opinion.)

KSU gameday thread

A lot of the KSU fans seem to think their defensive players had some money bet on the game because of all the long scoring plays and lack of tackling on their part. It's ridiculous, I know, but more than one poster mentioned that the fix was in and it was probably due to gambling. The play that convinced them this was true was the last Sama TD run, where their DB pushed Sama from behind and instead of knocking him down, gave him about 5 yards of separation.

Some were also not very high on Klieman and his conservative ground and pound offense and wanted to see Avery Johnson at QB instead of Howard. How come it is with most fan bases that the backup QB is always the better option?

Reading an opponent's gameday thread after we beat them is always fun for me.

TVs

I am in the market for a new TV. Looking at 65" models. Thinking OLED, but not totally locked in yet. My room can be fairly bright during the day, but can be reasonably to almost completely dark in the evenings. We stream virtually everything either via YoutubeTV or various other streaming services. TV shows, a lot of sports, movies, etc. Will be coming from a 10 year old Samsung 1080p LCD. Does anyone have any experience with the Sony A80L, LG C3 or Samsung S90C? Also in consideration are Hisense U8K and Sony X90L LED models. Something with a wider viewing angle is preferred.

The main question is how does streaming material look on any of these? Are sports clear and blur free?

FOOTBALL ***Cygarin Ratings Update: Texas***

This is one heck of a time for Bill to ask me to start doing my Cygarin Ratings analysis again, only to probably ruin my reputation. Either that or Jarrod Hufford is on to something.

The Cygarin Ratings suggest that Texas is indeed human, and it shows Iowa State as being favored by 3-points, which reflects a 57% chance of winning. Basically the Clones and the Horns appear even up at this moment in time, and Iowa State gets the benefit of the homefield advantage.

I’m in a bit of disbelief myself and have been looking the data over and over again to find any sort of error, bias, or missing information, or something. I can’t. Tangibly we are favored. What intangibles will play into this game…I don’t know. One of them is, of course…it’s Texas.

So what’s going on?

The Cygarin Ratings is based on the Sagarin Ratings, as most of you know. Sagarin rates teams on how they have done over the entire season. It’s an average (sort of, not exactly), that acts as kind of a report card for the whole semester, not how teams have done since mid-terms.

Sagarin currently has Iowa State ranked 34th (Predictor) which historically is pretty good. Pre-Campbell, that was a bit of a high bar for the Clones. When we consider how badly ISU played at the beginning of the season, the guys must be playing pretty darned good to lift the overall average up to 34th.

And we are!

Indeed, Iowa State is playing FAR better since Oklahoma. Actually, arguably you can go all the way back to Oklahoma State as the start of when we saw much better play happening. If you include OSU, Oklahoma stands out as a huge outlier performance sandwiched between two good performances against OSU and TCU, two very good teams where we played well. Either way, Iowa State has been playing good and getting far better since about that time.

And by FAR better, I mean that Kansas is the only game since OU that this team has played five points below their current Sagarin Rating. Indeed the good guys are averaging about ten points above their current rating since then.

Sagarin can’t recognize this, but I will…remove the three single touchdown-costing plays in the Kansas game, and you can add 21 points to that performance as well. Factor that in, this team is averaging 15 points per game better than their current rating. Wow! Only the Kansas game stands as a glitch in a continuously trending up performance since OU.

But, we did indeed make those mistakes in the Kansas game and others, so we do have to realize that we are talking about our aunts and not potential uncles. Even then though, with those warts included in the performance evaluation…the Clones are still playing 12 points above their rating over the last five games since Oklahoma.

I took an even more conservative approach and adjusted Iowa State’s Cygarin Rating up by only ten…even though I can make an argument for as much as 15.

That brings Iowa State’s performance since Oklahoma equal to a team ranked 10th in the country based on power ratings. And if you view it with a little common sense, if we had not blown the Ohio and Kansas games, and had lost to only Iowa and OU (both likely destined to CCG’s), being ranked 10th wouldn’t necessarily have been unreasonable.

On the other hand, Oklahoma is the only marker we have to evaluate how we would do against caliber opponents ranked higher than lower top-25. So maybe the data we do have is not representative of how we might do against top-10 teams in general.

So…there’s all that when considering how Iowa State is performing coming into the Texas game.

Now Texas…..

The Longhorns are going the other way. They have been trending down over the second half of the season. Not nearly as profoundly as Iowa State’s trend up…but it’s there. I could make an argument for 5 points lower, but they are fluctuating a lot and that makes it hard to pinpoint an actual performance level.

Sagarin currently has Texas rated 9th in the country. (I have Iowa State adjusted to 10th….see where this is going?)

But if they are playing 5 points lower than their rating, then Texas may not be a top-10 caliber team after all, not right now anyway. They lost to Oklahoma by four, but they did beat Kansas State at home by three. KSU at home though, drops under top-10 caliber.

Texas walloped Kansas 40-14 the fifth game into the season, a peak performance that was roughly equivalent to their earlier beating of Alabama. But ever since then, their performance on Saturdays has been sliding, with only one performance above their current rating, and four performances at or below it. Is it a trend? Or just playing no better than needed to win?

The “below” performances include ten-point under performances against TCU (winning by three points) last game, and Houston a few weeks ago. TCU is a top-25 power ranked team, and Longhorns winning by only three points…at home…may be suggestive of their recent abilities.

So as it is, I tweaked Texas down by only one point, almost nothing. But I could make a pretty sane argument that they could be dropped five or six. If I had done that, it would show Iowa State favored by eight or nine points, but I just can’t see Texas playing that much lower when they need to.

So to sum up Texas, take their 10th rating, subtract a recent performance point, subtract 3 points for Iowa State having home field advantage, Texas is a 18th point equivalent rated opponent in Jack Trice.

So in nutshell….

What the Cygarin Ratings see is two teams seemingly meeting at a crossroads of trends, with one team trending up profoundly, and the other trending down somewhat. Resultantly both teams appear to be meeting when they are playing at about the same level, or perhaps even Iowa State playing better.

Do I buy it? As hard as the numbers are to believe, I think I do. At least that I think we can compete.

But, we have been here before. Texas could go all “Alabama” on us, or Iowa State could go all “Kansas”, or both. But that does not take away what appears to be that the good guys have a better than even chance going into this game, assuming that we play good ball and don’t make costly mistakes.

The Cygarin Ratings can only evaluate tangible performance to date, and on paper anyway it shows Iowa State to be a slight favorite. The rest is up to Campbell and the players.

As far as us fans go, I don’t see any reason to not think we can't go into this game believing we are credible equals to the Longhorns.…so long as our young players keep their heads in the game and the can keep it clean and free from major errors.

(In my opinion.)

FB Preseason Media Poll

The Media Pundits got it wrong (other than the "gimmies" of OUT and KS)
2023 Big 12 Football Media Preseason Poll
1. Texas (41), 886
2. Kansas State (14), 858
3. Oklahoma (4), 758
4. Texas Tech (4), 729
5. TCU (3), 727
6. Baylor, 572
7. Oklahoma State (1), 470
8. UCF, 463
9. Kansas, 461
10. Iowa State, 334
11. BYU, 318
12. Houston, 215
13. Cincinnati, 202
14. West Virginia, 129

Needs For Next Year

As this year winds down with anothe physical game and Bowl prep and game, I am surprised and disappointed in the season. My disappointment is the inexplicable loss to Ohio and the flat first-half performance v. Kansas.

IMO, we should be 8-3 (6-2) right now. Texas was just better, particularly their defensive line versus our offensive line. That same mismatch, along with inexplicable coaching approach to that game, was a major factor versus EIU.

So what would I like to see for next year.
  1. Continues Special Teams improvement. Inconsistency has tempered the vast improvement we saw this year. That consistency is the next step, I think.
  2. A major step forward for the offensive line. I know. The never ending request of Cyclone fans.
  3. Depth on defense backfield, particularly safety. As hard as they hit, they just don't stand up for the long haul.
  4. Better linebacker play. We struggled with gap control (also safety issue) too often and that is critical to our style of defense.
Things sure look better than a year ago and way better than we could have imagined on June 1.
ADVERTISEMENT

Filter

ADVERTISEMENT