Is anyone else confused by this Randy Peterson article? He says if the Big 12 wants to validate the claim that it's the toughest basketball conference, then the #1 & #2 seeds have to meet in the championship? Isn't that 180 degrees from what you would think-that if the conference has good teams from top to (near) bottom, that anyone could win? And didn't we tie with Oklahoma for 2nd, so there really may not be much difference between us and them. No mention of that.....
At the end, he writes that the conference has to perform well in the NCAA tourney, that part I agree with.
What??
At the end, he writes that the conference has to perform well in the NCAA tourney, that part I agree with.
What??
