I think this has been posted before, but with the recent thread on revenue distribution, I thought it might be appropriate to throw this out again.
As previously implied, Texas and Texas A$M should never lose at ANY sport. Surprised that A$M has double the contributions of Texas. A$M revenue is $26 million more that third place Ohio State.
Didn't realize that ISU gets $2.1 million from student fees. Iowa gets $650,000. As per state directive, the two schools don't (apparently) get any state/taxpayer funding. Disappointed that ISU taps the students. I thought the department was fully self funded by now. Hard to refute complaints about coaches salaries in my opinion when students are contributing.
Many of the Power 5 schools get some funds from students and universities (taxpayers?). Click on the school breaks it down more. The "% allocated" column shows the % of revenue from "student fees, direct and indirect institutional support and state money." For reference, UNI gets 48% of its budget this way.
Click on the column headings to sort.
I'm sure there are some on the board that will analyze in more detail.
https://sports.usatoday.com/ncaa/finances/
This link explains the headings...
https://sports.usatoday.com/2018/06...17-ncaa-athletic-department-revenue-database/
As previously implied, Texas and Texas A$M should never lose at ANY sport. Surprised that A$M has double the contributions of Texas. A$M revenue is $26 million more that third place Ohio State.
Didn't realize that ISU gets $2.1 million from student fees. Iowa gets $650,000. As per state directive, the two schools don't (apparently) get any state/taxpayer funding. Disappointed that ISU taps the students. I thought the department was fully self funded by now. Hard to refute complaints about coaches salaries in my opinion when students are contributing.
Many of the Power 5 schools get some funds from students and universities (taxpayers?). Click on the school breaks it down more. The "% allocated" column shows the % of revenue from "student fees, direct and indirect institutional support and state money." For reference, UNI gets 48% of its budget this way.
Click on the column headings to sort.
I'm sure there are some on the board that will analyze in more detail.
https://sports.usatoday.com/ncaa/finances/
This link explains the headings...
https://sports.usatoday.com/2018/06...17-ncaa-athletic-department-revenue-database/
